Delayed payments to SME suppliers have long been treated as a norm in many procurement-heavy industries across Saudi Arabia. Whether driven by internal approval cycles, cash flow priorities, or sheer scale, it’s often seen as a working capital strategy rather than a liability.
But this approach is now creating structural risk undermining supply chain continuity, inflating procurement costs, and eroding supplier trust. In a market increasingly shaped by localization mandates, ESG accountability, and digital transformation, the cost of late payments goes beyond simple inconvenience.
SME suppliers form the backbone of many supply chains in sectors like construction, healthcare, retail, and logistics. When payments are delayed beyond 60, 90, or even 120 days, small suppliers struggle to:
The result? Production delays, missed deadlines, and project cost overruns for corporates relying on those suppliers.
A 2023 Monsha’at report highlighted that over 45% of SMEs in Saudi Arabia face cash flow disruptions due to delayed payments, leading to increased project abandonment and procurement fragmentation.
Operational impact: The cost of re-sourcing and requalifying a supplier mid-project can exceed 15–20% of original supplier spend.
In Saudi Arabia, prompt payment to suppliers especially SMEs—is not just best practice. It is quickly becoming a governance expectation. Government-backed initiatives like the Prompt Payment Regulation and localization policies under Vision 2030 are pushing for:
Failure to comply may lead to exclusion from preferred supplier programs, reputational damage in tenders, or more scrutiny during audits.
Example: In 2024, several government-linked entities revised supplier engagement policies to favor corporates with better payment records and SME finance enablement strategies.
Delaying supplier payments might look like a working capital win. But in reality, it comes with hidden costs:
This creates a cycle where supplier financial strain bleeds into corporate procurement costs undermining your long-term margin and supplier reliability.
Long payment terms disproportionately affect your most efficient suppliers—the ones that are lean, fast, and dependable. These suppliers can’t absorb long cash gaps and will often:
For corporates with 1,000+ SME vendors, even a 2–3% attrition rate in core suppliers can translate into real sourcing and quality control issues.
Internal data from regional procurement teams show supplier requalification and onboarding can take 8–12 weeks per vendor, further straining operations.
Embedding a supplier finance solution into your procurement and ERP stack allows corporates to:
Platforms like Himma are designed specifically for the Saudi market—syncing with corporate ERP systems to offer real-time visibility, zero-friction approvals, and transparent tracking of financed invoices.
Suppliers receive early payments from the platform. Corporates pay on the usual cycle. Everyone wins.
In today’s operating environment, late payments aren’t neutral they’re a signal. To regulators, they indicate poor governance. To suppliers, they suggest indifference. And internally, they reflect a disconnect between finance and procurement.
Saudi corporates that prioritize supplier liquidity, continuity, and trust will outperform not just financially, but in resilience and reputation.